UN summit in Mexico as hot raging controversy about the climate in Cancun.
Since Monday the battle raging about the climate in Cancun (Mexico), from Tuesday, the UN summit enters the decisive round: large ministerial meeting on the Caribbean Sea. And what did we expect? Probably nothing. After the high hopes that were in the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009 (Hagen Hope ") is set, the participants are disillusioned in Cancun.
A major climate change agreement, cheap wow power leveling, is not even on the map. Nevertheless, controversy has given it enough and will be available in the second round on. But who wants what in Mexico?
Developing nations such as China and Mexico call for a continuation of the Kyoto Protocol, which is bringing the industrialized countries required to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions significantly.
, global agenda credits, For Beijing, it was "vital", "get a confirmation that there will be a second phase of the obligation (of the Kyoto Protocol)" in Cancun, said the Chinese negotiator Su.
The "real numbers" to reduce climate-damaging CO2 emissions by the industrialized countries must not be established in the negotiations in Cancun, Mexico, but next year could be, sto credits, discussed. "But it is very important to send a clear message to the world that the Kyoto Protocol is updated," said Su.
Japan made clear, however, that it is against an extension of the Kyoto Protocol. Canada and Russia also appeared hesitant or hostile. They point out that countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol has copies today only for 30 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and China is now the largest carbon dioxide emitter in the world.
The developing nations insist again merely a right to an economic recovery to have. They see the established industrial states have a duty to bear the brunt of the necessary climate protection measures. EU chief negotiators Artur Runge-Metzger had called the issue of the Kyoto Protocol on Friday as a "sword of Damocles" over the climate negotiations.
The old debate – he also goes further in Cancun. Nevertheless, the meeting was completely different than Copenhagen, observers say.
"The process is much more transparent. The Mexicans try to really take on all parties on board, (…) and not to organize parallel negotiations," added the chief negotiator of the German delegation, Karsten Sach. "Second, we wanted to clarify things in Copenhagen in a big package."
The main task of the ministerial meeting beginning on Tuesday it would be to form the building blocks of a balanced outcome, "says Zech. To be seen how stable the building blocks …
DeTToX wrote: 7 hours ago
There are many indications that the> Climate Summit 'in the Mexican resort of Cancun Luxury swan song for the equally expensive as ineffective climate policy. After the publication compromising e-mails … There are many indications that the 'climate summit' in the Mexican resort of Cancun to the luxury of a swan song as costly as ineffective climate policy. After the publication compromising e-mails through a Wistleblower far unidentified,> 'of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia in Norwich a year ago, become known as "Climate Gate <-scandal and the subsequent fiasco of the largest UN palaver of all time in Copenhagen, there is pull the stings of various UN bureaucracy failed, the> climate <back to the earlier appearance of respectability to lend. On the contrary, the discovery of a series of> inaccuracies' in the last report of the "IPCC <IPCC were the doubts about the scientific competence of the Committee more food.
malsachlich wrote: 9 hours ago
Guitar @ Rider: why speak Klimaluegen profiteers so for some time no longer "climate warming" but of "climate change" because you can be refuted in the former term too easily and too quickly. "W. .. @ Guitar Rider: That's why profiteers speak Klimaluegen-ja for some time no longer" climate warming "but of" climate change "because it too easily and too quickly to be settled may term the former at." Convertible "however, can be anything …
malsachlich wrote: 9 hours ago
Guitar @ Rider: why speak Klimaluegen profiteers so for some time no longer "climate warming" but of "climate change" because you can be refuted in the former term too easily and too quickly. "W. .. @ Guitar Rider: That's why profiteers speak Klimaluegen-ja for some time no longer" climate warming "but of" climate change "because it too easily and too quickly to be settled may term the former at." Convertible "however, can be anything …
Guitar Rider wrote: 10 hours ago
To all the CO2-Lueger-blind faith: The Gulf Stream fluctuates. If he actually said to be colder, and it was colder here in Europe will be in how the then explained that the glaciers constantly schmilzen here: … To all the CO2-Lueger-Blind Faith The Gulf Stream fluctuates. If he actually said to be colder, and it was colder here in Europe can be, as explained then that the glacier schmilzen here constantly? And if what the apostles did, then, ice or heat disaster … you can decide for you at least once? http://www.news.de/gesellschaft/855074638/unsere-sea-heating-varies-and-totters / 1 / And then I do not know how to disappear the island is where the sea level, as posted in the last article in that time period a year by only 5 mm was (not meters) increased ? http://www.wetterforum24.de/neue-theorie-meeresspiegel-sink t-place-to-steigen.html http://diepresse.com/home/science/6115 06/Kommt-ForschungsKlimawandel http://www. spiegel.de / Scientific aft/natur/0, 1518,685474,00. html
Leo456 wrote: 10 hours ago
The Klimaluege is only a pretext under which the 3rd World to the developed countries to start. It is racial hatred (against us) and greed against us), nothing else (. The Klimaluege is only a pretext under which the 3rd World to the developed countries to start. It is racial hatred (against us) and greed (for us), nothing else.